Oooooft.
Here we
are again.
It's Tory
party conference time and as usual the spin doctors are leaking
information on the hour every hour.
Add in
the pre-conference interviews with our illustrious leader and I would
suspect that by the time he takes to the stage to preach to the
perverted that we could all claim truthfully that we have heard it
all before.
It's
extremely doubtful that he will utter one unexpected sentence to the
assembled throng.
In fact
most of us could probably write his script for him.
Cut out
all the rousing 'we are all in this together' diatribe and to sum it
up he will say that Labour left us in a more dire financial state
than any of us could ever have imagined, and therefore to put the
great back into Great Britain we will all have to tighten our belts
even more, and count ourselves lucky that we aren't the Greeks, Irish
or anyone else whose economy has tanked.
That some
of us have tightened our belts to the extent that two size zero
models could neatly fit inside and do a synchronized hula hoop
display is neither here nor there apparently.
Of course
the money that will be required will have to come from somewhere, so
we can fully expect 'Call me Dave' to announce that it isn't going to
be found from the deep pocketed, and equally short armed wealthy, or
the continually profit making conglomerates who can well afford to
pay their tax, but instead from those who can least afford it.
We have
heard the song often enough now that we all know the words.
In fact
he has already said that it will 'have' to come from the benefits
pot.
Now today
his partner in crime, the arch villain Mr Osborne who is presiding
over financial genocide, is reiterating his masters 'cut and slash
the finances of the poor' comments like a ventriloquists dummy.
Only this
time there's some more nuggets of misery to think about as he has let
it be known that the cuts are to the tune of £10 billion, and that
they will be coming from housing benefit for the young and from child
support benefits
It's the
usually broad brush strokes announcement that relies on the
manipulation of peoples perceptions to make them sound reasonable.
The
unemployed young are shiftless.
Basically
verging on feral.
So why
should we assume any financial responsibility for them as they are
undeserving of it?
Who wants
one of these kids as their neighbour from hell?
The easy
solution is to withdraw their ability to claim housing benefit and
then they will have to stay at home with their parents.
Sounds
fine and dandy when put like that doesn't it?
It saves
us some hassle and cash.
Brilliant.
Only
let's look at some of the things that are never mentioned as it
doesn't suit their final solution.
First,
where are all these golden opportunities for the young?
How can
anyone apply for a non existent job?
Why
should they be demonised for not working when there is scant work
available.
How about
if you are a young man or woman who has sorted out a good job for
yourself.
Moved out and grabbed some independence with two hands and are aspiring to get your foot on the property ladder.
Then find yourself out of work, or if you were lucky enough to hang onto employment found that your hours had been cut to the point that you have more going out than going in financially.
Moved out and grabbed some independence with two hands and are aspiring to get your foot on the property ladder.
Then find yourself out of work, or if you were lucky enough to hang onto employment found that your hours had been cut to the point that you have more going out than going in financially.
Your
option to remain where you reside is to claim housing benefit, but
no, not now.
You've
been excluded.
Guess you
will just have to move back in with your parents.
Unfortunately
once you left the nest they decided that their home was too large for
them to rattle about in and downsized.
So where
are you going?
Don't
look at me for an answer. I don't know either.
Then
there's the harsh reality that some young people need to leave the
parental home as it's a dysfunctional and abusive environment.
Their
only hope for a happy future lies in leaving and severing ties with
their past, but under the new housing benefit rules that option has
been swept away from below their feet.
That's
great, and goes a long way towards encouraging anyone to be a solid
citizen.
Or how
about if you were in a relationship and were enjoying the little
house and the 2.4 kids life.
That is
until your partner lost his or her job, or buggered off with someone
they worked with, or sadly died.
The
safety net for you is partially housing benefit.
Not for
long though.
What
happens if you also fall under the new rules for child benefit and
are excluded from some of them depending on how many kids you have.
It never
rains, but it pours eh?
There you
were living the life one day, and the next you're plunging from the
tightrope and plummeting headlong to the cold hard ground as a
statistically acceptable loss in the deficit war.
Bit shit
really, but don't worry. Everyone knows the young are resilient and
you will bounce back.
Of course
we are all in this together though.
Unless of
course if you are under a certain age, or have too many kids.
It's not
sounding so good now is it?
None of
the scenarios laid out there fit in with how we should be perceiving
those targeted.
Similarly
the reduction in child support benefits that they claim will be aimed
at those who have large families, and are unemployed, is mired in a
skewed perception of the recipients.
Are they
all the largely stereotypical benefit sponging families that are
depicted in the press and so perfectly portrayed in the television
show 'Shameless'?
Or as we
are all aware, are many of them just victims of circumstances.
Should
the family whose main breadwinner has just been made redundant with
no pay out be treated the same as the habitually unemployed baby
making machines that a very small minority are?
Should
the recently widowed be targeted?
Many of
us have had to deal with changes in circumstances that have
necessitated a reliance of the state through no fault of our own.
Should a
portion of us be left out in the cold now?
Apparently
so.
In the
next few days read what has been getting promoted as solutions from
the Conservatives, and then consider what they really mean.
Put
yourself in the shows of those who are about to lose out and try and
think about how you would feel if you were to find yourself
struggling and no lifeline was available to you.
It really
is time for a change.
Time for
people to start questioning who is really benefiting from the
solutions to the global financial woes that are being broached.
It's not
me, and I doubt it's many of you.
You know about as much about politics as you do about music. Both could be fitted on a pinhead.
ReplyDeleteYet you are here reading and commenting.
ReplyDeleteHowever you are entitled to your opinion.
I like to keep up to date with what shite you are spouting Mainy.
ReplyDeleteGood for you 'X'.
ReplyDeleteYou know who I am.
My identity is no secret.
Over there on your right is even a list of places I'll be and on what dates.
Yet you post your comments in anonymity.
Interestingly signing off with an x is what the illiterate and ill educated used to do when they couldn't manage their full name on a document.
I wonder if that is relevant.
Answers on a pinhead please.
Very funny.
ReplyDeleteMaybe we will see each other one day.
I'll look forward to it.
ReplyDeleteWear a carnation and carry a copy of the Beano so I know it's you.