Scourge
of politicians, regardless of their leanings he may be, but when he
came up against the youngest minister that Cameron has – Chloe
Smith - he must have thought for a second that if he turned the heat
up a bit he might be accused of child abuse.
Here she
was all doe eyed and girly, trying to strike a balance between
femininity and authority, while Paxman, and his audience were looking
for something a little more akin to honesty.
Within
seconds the two worlds collided.
Any
consideration for her inexperience, age and gender vanished as she
displayed ignorance and arrogance in equal measure
Her
inability - paired with an apparent unwillingness - to answer the
most basic question worked like a red rag, and whether he wanted to
or not Paxman reverted to type.
His
bullish tenacity came to the fore, and without raising the
questioning to the heights of illustrious debate the simple
repetitive nature of his interview style seen Chloe Smith take on the
persona of a smiling, but empty headed, rabbit in the headlights.
One who
could only utter responses in the style of a POW providing name, rank
and number.
It's
entirely possible that her preparation for the interview took ten
minutes.
Nine to
apply lip gloss and one to nod vacuously at George Osborne as he told
her that there was nothing to worry about just as long as she sat
there and looked pretty.
Now
please don't accuse me of sexism as I couldn't care less what Chloe
Smith looks like.
Or what
age she is for that matter.
I suspect
that a pr spin team engineered this debacle, and it's they who
decided that rolling out what they considered was a pretty face on a young woman would be to
their advantage, and it was Chloe herself who went along with it.
They, and
she, can reap what they have sown.
Let's be
brutally honest here and ask why she was even on the show.
When word
came in that 'the pax' wanted to discuss Osborne's u-turn on fuel
duty is it possible that Chloe Smith was considered as the
sacrificial lamb, and then happily went to the slaughter in the
misguided belief that she was taking one for the team.
If that
is the case then she is dimmer than I thought as this is not a
government that respects loyalty
Let's
take a step back for a second though..
What did
we really see here?
A young
politician out of her depth?
Or was it
more?
I would
say more.
What we
seen, in my opinion, was a minister who was floundering because she
has no idea of what is going on.
A
minister who is completely out of the loop and was cast to the lions.
Albeit voluntarily.
She isn't the first minister to stumble into the spotlight and shakily expand on a void of information, and I doubt she will be the last.
It seems
obvious that she possessed just as many facts as Paxman's research
team had managed to dredge up from a press release and a few
headlines, and no more than that.
It's also
entirely possible that the reason that she doesn't have the
information to hand is because it changes on the hour.
Now
that's worrying.
Is she
the underling to headless chickens who have a
great deal of self belief, loads of personal cash, a sense of
entitlement and a fundamentalist attitude to slash and burn policies
that are designed to maintain the positions of those at the top, and nothing else?
Now
that's a scary thought, and one that I don't think is far from the
truth.
I sway
between holding the position that the Conservatives know exactly what
they are doing, and then the illogical nature of it pushes me towards
thinking that polices are hammered out after a Bullingdon Club lunch
when they are all pissed and think that mooning diners in a cafe and
cutting funding to a hospital are both jolly wheezes.
I keep
thinking that someone has to jump in from the wings and say to the
nation that we are all on candid camera.
What we
seen in Newsnight lends itself to us considering that this could all
be a joke, and Chloe Smith is simply an actress who failed to read
her script.
Who
really knows?
The
bottom line is that we as a nation are doing very little to question
what is going on, and we should.
Watch the
footage yourself.
Keep in
mind that Chloe Smith is a minister in a government that is supposed
to be representing our interests, and then ask yourself if you have
any faith in her.
In fact
ask yourself if you would let her house sit for twenty minutes while
you pop out to the supermarket.
If this
unfunny comedy sketch of an interview isn't enough to concern you
then check out the double act of tweedle dumb and tweedle dumber that
is May and Gove, and then come back to me and tell me that your
unconcerned and everything will work out fine.
If you
can do then then I honestly think that there's no hope for us all.
No comments:
Post a Comment