Edmund
Burke, the Irish philosopher of the 1700s is immensely quotable.
In
a letter he said that 'Those
who have been once intoxicated with power, and have derived any kind
of emolument from it, even though but for one year, never can
willingly abandon it. They may be distressed in the midst of all
their power; but they will never look to any thing but power for
their relief.'
It's
a comment that rings true through the centuries.
Who
could really doubt his words?
Power
does indeed corrupt, or as Lord Acton said 'Power tends to corrupt,
and absolute power corrupts absolutely.'
Is
it human nature to lust after power though?
It
would appear so.
Could
we really argue that there has ever been a time that peoples lives
have not been blighted by the pursuit of it by others?
Empires
have risen and fallen on the waves of the insatiable need to accrue
as much influence and power as possible.
We
see the same thing in the modern business world.
Hostile
take overs of land by countries are now hostile take overs of
companies by multinationals, and from my perspective they create
similar amounts of casualties.
Broken
lives litter the wake of the pursuit of absolute control.
Expand
or die is apparently the motto.
More,
more, more. Always more.
Although
having everything still seems to falls short of being enough.
We
see examples of this everywhere.
From
the CEO's of the multinationals to the dealers on the street corners
this lust exists.
It's
really just a matter of scale.
Take
small nascent music scenes as an example.
Recently
I've seen issues rising that were rooted in the expansionist agendas
of a minority in Glasgow, and here in Ayrshire.
I
wasn't surprised as at my age I have seen the same thing happen more
often than I would care to admit.
Yet
while I wasn't surprised, I was left feeling heart weary at the
inability of people to break the cycle.
So
let me lay out how this works and maybe someone somewhere will
remember what they have read and use it as a 'how not to do it
guide.'
Okay.
Sitting comfortably?
Here
we go.
Initially
everything is great.
A
band, artist, radio station, or even a promoter comes along and
creates something that previously wasn't there.
The
spark of originality is fanned and others start to gravitate towards
what is going on.
It's
still all great.
Altruistic
positivity is the byword.
This
moment can last for varying lengths of time.
Everything
is new and every step forward is an attempt to break new ground.
Then
the original sin moment creeps in.
The
introduction of the corruption of the original ideals float to the
surface, and either an individual, or a group, starts to think about
what is in it for them, rather than what is mutually beneficial to
all.
It's
often difficult to tell who they are though.
Some
will always of had an eye out for an angle that they can use to their
own benefit.
They're
the parasitic leaches whose only interest is in lining their own
pockets while advancing on their dreams of building a self serving
empire that they can preside over.
Like
carnival hucksters they will spin a line and in their eye you can see
the gleam of a bright future.
Only
that bright future is reserved for them solely.
They
just never mention that.
They
will have no qualms at all about sucking the life blood out of a
scene and leaving it as a dried out husk.
In
the blink of an eye they will walk away from the broken dreams and
laugh all the way to the bank, or onto pastures new where they can
exploit yet more people.
Others
will have started off with the best intentions and then been
corrupted along the way as the plaudits for their endeavours rolled
in.
They've
been seduced by the power.
When
they looked into the abyss they found it attractive.
Power
is their aphrodisiac, their drug.
They
then get wrapped in their own delusions and from there on in
everything has to revolve around them, and hell mend anyone who
doesn't get with the plan.
A
plan that ultimately once again only benefits a minority.
Often
just that one individual.
Once
these people arrive on the scene it really is the beginning of the
end.
In
Glasgow a certain person made a move to slowly but surely take over
much of the traditional punk scene.
If
there was a touring band from yesteryear with a name for themselves
then his finger wasn't just in the pie, but instead he was up to his
elbows in it.
Everything
revolved around his band playing, his friends bands playing, and
bullying others to get in line with what he was doing, or fuck off.
Unless
you doffed your cap and showed respect then the scene would be an
exclusive one that you were not allowed to be part of.
Basically
something that could have been built on turned into an ugly situation
run by a clique of bullies?
Is
there a collective name for that?
If
there can be a murder of crows, a sleuth of bears, then could there
be a bastard of cunts?
Whatever
we want to call them isn't really relevant though as once that stage
is reached then it's all downhill.
Then
there's the woman who is known for putting on under 14s gigs.
It
sounds nice and positive.
Young
musicians of that age struggle to find venues that will allow them to
showcase their talents, and should be supported in doing so.
However
there's a difference in seeing that an environment needs to be
created to allow young talent to flourish, and seeing a niche in the
market that needs to be exploited.
Once
again over a period of time a toxic reputation started to build, and
no matter how altruistic the original premise was, the bastardization
of it warped it until it reached a stage where as a venture it was
indistinguishable from those set in motion by charlatans looking to
make a quick buck.
Then
lastly there are the people who come bearing the offer of plenty.
Enthusiastically
and tirelessly they support local artists until they have their feet
under the table.
Once
they do carve themselves a niche the mask slips a little though, and
a ruthless attitude to expansion reveals itself.
Those
who oppose the expansion are dealt with in moves that are obviously
lifted wholesale from the book 'Purges for Dummies' by Joseph Stalin.
From
covering one area they attempt to move into another, and then yet
another.
In
a short space of time a blitzkrieg approach is revealed and the
momentum carries them ever onward,...........well ever onward until
the wheels fall off the train and they're derailed due to their
behaviour managing to tip the balance and piss too many people off.
From
then the negative aspects of how they went about accruing control is
all that anyone remembers and all the good that they had done, or
could have done, is forgotten.
So
what do these all have in common?
Well
apart from the formation of cliques and bullying it's the boom and
bust cycle isn't it?
If
people can get on board with that then the next question would be how
can we all avoid the bust aspect of it and maintain the boom?
The
answer actually seems very simple.
Just
don't succumb to putting personal interests first all the time.
Consider
the bigger picture and play a longer and more inclusively positive
game.
Accept
that there is room for everyone.
Support
each other.
...and
nip the negative forces in the bud.
Never
let then get a toehold.
Their
influence is a malignant cancer that will destroy the potential of
what could be.
Think
about what could be achieved if the trend was bucked and we all
refused to be swayed by our own apparent selfish nature, or that of
others.
While
all that may sound simple it's actually a big ask as I've yet to see
it being put into practice by enough people for it to matter.
It's
entirely possible that I've just wasted my time writing this, but
I'll go full circle and end it with a paraphrase of another quote
from Edmund Burke.
'All
that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do
nothing.'
This blog update is
dedicated to my friends, and supporters of original music, Sandie
Noone and Taylor Buntain.